Content creationProduct Title Description Creation

Overview

When you’re selling products or building a directory, writing descriptions one by one doesn’t scale. Hiring writers gets expensive fast, and copying data back and forth between spreadsheets and AI tools wastes hours.

One pattern we see is using automation to turn structured product data into publish-ready descriptions, without adding headcount.

In this example workflow, Google Sheets stays the source of truth. Each product row is automatically sent to Jasper, the description is generated, and the result is written back into the same sheet. The outcome is a repeatable system that lets ecommerce operators and directory builders publish faster and keep margins intact.

This is one way teams increase output while keeping costs predictable.

Step 1

Prepare the product data

Create a structured sheet that the automation can reliably read from and write to.

Typical Inputs

Product title
SEO keywords
Optional brand or tone notes

Results

A clean, structured sheet ready for automation

Step 2

Watch for rows that need descriptions

Trigger the automation when new rows are added or when rows are missing descriptions.

Typical Inputs

Google Sheet rows

Results

Only rows that actually need processing move forward

Step 3

Generate the description with Jasper

Send each product to Jasper with a clear, controlled prompt.

Typical Inputs

Product title
Keywords
Optional brand notes

Results

A finished product description

Step 4

Write the result back to the sheet

Save the generated description and mark the row as complete.

Typical Inputs

Jasper output

Results

A completed row, ready to review or publish

Step 5

Handle errors safely

Prevent silent failures and duplicate runs.

Typical Inputs

Errors or empty responses

Results

Clear visibility into what worked and what needs attention

Why this example works

In this pattern, each tool does one job well:

  • Google Sheets stays the source of truth
  • Make handles logic and orchestration
  • Jasper focuses only on writing

By keeping everything inside the same loop, teams remove manual steps, reduce mistakes, and maintain visibility over what’s been generated.

This is one common approach but not the only one. Many people adapt it by swapping tools, changing prompts, or adding review steps.

If you use a similar workflow, or do this differently, we’re actively collecting real examples if you’d like to share them. https://www.boostaify.com/contact-us/